New Step by Step Map For h4831sc
New Step by Step Map For h4831sc
Blog Article
Given that there isn't going to look like any "official" Load Data available for this Load, can a number of you present a starting point with this combination and issues to think about when Doing the job this Load up?
I've made use of H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There aren't many cartridges which i utilize it for as I appear usually to gravitate to other powders. Even so, I am unable to say that it would not operate. It is simply that Various other powders function better for any presented cartridge. For instance, within the 280, H4831 gave me superior velocity and really high-quality groups with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. On the other hand, RL19 was marginally superior in precision, although the velocity was just about similar.
What is actually the main difference? Compression. Without the extreme/weighty compression associated with the prolonged grain 7828, the tension curve was altered and the load fell apart.
Minnesota H4831SC is my head over to from the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the tiny I've still left for tumble 2021. I might begin low and perform your way up, determined by what load data you look at for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.
My experience would be that the SC and SSC loaded to the exact same pounds as the very long cut exhibits a decreased velocity.
I realize, rough instances. H4831SC will definitely operate, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded very long. I do not bear in mind powder charge off the very best of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which happens to be in which I generally purpose to become. In your scenario employing what you may have (and what I should have finished) I'd begin with the top with the bearing surface with the bullet proper for the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as soon as you locate a velocity node.
I don't love to operate up a load working with one particular large amount of powder after which have to work up once more mainly because I run out and possess to start out utilizing a new good deal number.
excaliber mentioned: I have observed the exact opposite to generally be correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally accurate powder in my 300 Get Mag.
WA I'd advise a slower burner that h4831 vs h4831sc should give superior case density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you are loading heavies very long.
It also goes on to declare that because of the fshorter grains, that load density is likely to be a bit better.
This really is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an previous thread. You should take into consideration developing a new thread.
It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Located a node and shot some teams. I shot a .six five shot group currently. It's just a little slower than H1000, but shoots fantastic. Many thanks for the advice, It really is fantastic h4831sc to know that I've received possibilities when a person or the other powder is dried up.
Chances are you'll both: 1) Proceed and have the items listed down below quickly faraway from your searching cart:
The point that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder h4831 vs h4831sc is precisely why you are looking at greater velocities received with that powder, as opposed to Whatever you've found With all the IMR things.